Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Poplectual

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 03:05, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Poplectual

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unused and unsourced neologism. PROD removed without rationale. Dori ☾Talk ☯ Contribs☽ 00:45, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:40, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. A search turns up only couple of tweets from the coiner, dated 15 Jul 12. —Tamfang (talk) 02:22, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as a non-notable neologism. Urban Dictionary is thattaway... ----> Carrite (talk) 04:49, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
'Delete; Wikipedia is not for things you made up one day. Ironholds (talk) 13:09, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per WP:NEO and WP:ONEDAY. -- Quiddity (talk) 21:21, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.