Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pongr

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 11:02, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pongr

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional article written by a now-block advertising-only/WP:COI account (see original linkspam report here. Nearly all of the references in the article are press releases, local corp coverage in Boston or trivial mentions (e.g., being mentioned as a partner in a promotional campaign). There are a few that are borderline passing for WP:RS, but none of those have significant depth of coverage. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 03:21, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:54, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:55, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:55, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the references are mostly junk. Mccapra (talk) 05:27, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.