Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Plumbus

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Rick and Morty. (non-admin closure) —UY Scuti ^Talk 18:14, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Plumbus

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG; I could not find any significant media coverage of a Plumbus. This fictional item does not inherit notability from Rick and Morty either. The article also does not distinguish between reality and ficiton; it describes a Plumbus as a real item. Sunmist (talk) 18:20, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:01, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:01, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:01, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:01, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Subject is only relevant from tv show. No independent coverage. Meatsgains (talk) 20:23, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to TV show to forestall inadvertent recreation - David Gerard (talk) 22:29, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect (after delete) to Rick and Morty; not independently notable. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:49, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect as of now. Unless the Plumbus has a much larger role in the series, an article isn't appropriate for now. Yoshiman6464 (talk) 13:18, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Rick and Morty: I agree the subject is non-notable and lacks enough independent coverage to justify having its own page. Aoba47 (talk) 23:39, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete For ruining the joke on my userpage! (Just kidding, I actually vote Redirect) Jergling (talk) 19:09, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.