Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Plattmakers
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 17:20, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Plattmakers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This is a private website. Its just an abusion for advertising it. Someone202102 (talk) 18:16, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2021 February 22. —cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:42, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
Automated comment: This AfD cannot be processed correctly because of an issue with the header. Please make sure the header has only 1 article, and doesn't have any HTML encoded characters.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:42, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 19:14, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 19:14, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete: not referenced, also per nom. versacespacetalk to me 02:17, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete: Looks like no significant coverage online. ~ Ase1estecharge-paritytime 13:06, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.