Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pir Muhammad Iqbal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:04, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pir Muhammad Iqbal

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Only cited sources are op-eds by the article subject. No significant coverage came up in a search for sources, with two caveats:

the search was complicated by there being other people who go by "Iqbal Ahmed"
I searched for English-language sources

Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 05:02, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Archaeology and India. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 05:02, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, I did a further search (much with the same caveats) and failed to find much else to verify the article. The person seems to fail WP:BIO and I don't believe there is any other cross-wiki content on the person.
Leaning delete. Does not seem notable, I could not find any mentions. Draft:Iqbal_Ahmad appears to be about the same person. CT55555(talk) 07:30, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: as per nom. and other editors said above. 𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙‍♂️^{Let's Talk !} 09:53, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 11:49, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: no evidence of notability per the sources cited, and the creator hasn't come up with anything better since this was nommed almost a week ago, which strongly suggests there isn't anything better to be found. --DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:42, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.