Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pipo the robot

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Overblood#Characters. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:31, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pipo the robot

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Particularly not notable. I'm not familiar with cataloguing what appears to be a secondary character, and the claim of "Pipo gained great fame"? The only ref is to gameinformer.com. WP:NOTNEWS & WP:BURDEN. Phearson (talk) 01:48, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Gordon17freeman (talk) 02:16, 25 January 2011 (UTC)gordon17freeman I added some more references. Is there something else you think I should do?[reply]

See the talk page. But I seriously doubt this will pass as is. Phearson (talk) 02:20, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Also the secondary character Alyx Vance from Half-life also has her own Wikipedia page. Gordon17freeman (talk) 02:21, 25 January 2011 (UTC)gordon17freeman[reply]

Could you possibly give me about one more hour to expand on the article? Gordon17freeman (talk) 02:24, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: AfDs last seven days unless more time is need to get consensus. This is not a CSD, whereas the article may be deleted by an admin right away. Good Luck! Phearson (talk) 02:31, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails notability. Edison (talk) 03:06, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - trivial fictional subject with no evidence of notability. Robofish (talk) 12:33, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Overblood#Characters. Not enough coverage to warrant an article on itself WP:GNG. Chzz ► 15:16, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 01:47, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:47, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:48, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep I cleaned it up and added some reception. _Blake ^{(Talk·Edits)} 02:11, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Merge anything relevant to Overblood, which is so short that nothing should be split off at this time per WP:AVOIDSPLIT. Characters that only appear in one or two fictional works shouldn't (generally) have a separate article anyway. – sgeureka ^t•c 08:26, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I agree. 1 C-class is better then 2 starts. _Blake ^{(Talk·Edits)} 14:09, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.