Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pimp Lucius
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Trapped in the Closet. MBisanz talk 20:46, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Pimp Lucius (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Completely unreferenced fictional character article. No refs and I can't find and solid refs in google. PROD removed by creator without substantial improvement. Stuartyeates (talk) 17:18, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not notable. Shorthate (talk) 20:33, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 19:48, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 19:48, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 19:48, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Trapped in the Closet, the one place where this character has any context. No independent notability, and the redirect sends readers to the logical placto Trapped in the Closete where he might be mentioned.Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 08:37, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Trapped in the Closet. While this character does get mentions in reliable sources that are addressing Trapped in the Closet, coverage does not seem to warrant a separate entry. I don't think that a merge is necessary, as much of the material here is already to be found there. A brief character summary there might be useful, but I think it would be better to start from scratch. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 19:46, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.