Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pi network Project

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 00:18, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Pi network Project

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable cryptocurrency project. Electricmemory (talk) 17:42, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: {{subst:spa|username}}; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}}.

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Cryptocurrency and Software. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:34, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Stay,

yes I support this project it shouldn't be deleted 2409:408A:3E39:EB4D:0:0:2DCB:3218 (talk) 03:25, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

— Note: An editor has expressed a concern that 2409:408A:3E39:EB4D:0:0:2DCB:3218 (talk • contribs) has been canvassed to this discussion. - UtherSRG (talk) 12:31, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Stay,

yes I support Pi network it should not be deleted.its a wonderful project 103.100.17.16 (talk) 04:32, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

— Note: An editor has expressed a concern that 103.100.17.16 (talk • contribs) has been canvassed to this discussion. - UtherSRG (talk) 12:31, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Most, if not all, references fail WP:SIRS. UtherSRG (talk) 12:12, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, fails WP:NCORP and WP:GNG - David Gerard (talk) 00:38, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Stay, as the article is not a promotion and it is reporting a project where 60 millions users participated and either it suceeds or fails it deserves a reporting for the history. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tarek1984 (talk • contribs) 10:32, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
"Stay" isn't a standard !vote. You may want to read about contributing to AfD discussions. And while you are doing that, read WP:NCORP and WP:GNG, our policies on notability which govern what is acceptable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. - UtherSRG (talk) 12:28, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors 130.225.198.177 (talk) 16:21, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I am well aware, hence the term "!vote" and note "vote". - UtherSRG (talk) 19:39, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The term you are looking for is "keep", not "stay". - UtherSRG (talk) 19:40, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: this source that's already in the article might be borderline WP:SIRS, but I can't find any other sources that are clearly reliable and contain significant coverage. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 02:57, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.