Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Physics and Star Wars (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep per WP:SNOW, non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps•Review?)} 01:26, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Physics and Star Wars

Trivia and fancruft. Metrackle 07:07, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Well-sourced commentary on a notable cultural artifact. Needs expanding with opinions from sources other than the two listed, but that isn't a reason for deletion. JulesH 09:41, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep Nominator has not bothered to construct a decent argument for deletion and has added absolutely nothing to the debate from the last AfD that ended with a keep. Irishjp 10:14, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Article has improved significantly since its 1st AfD, addressing the poorly-written OR concerns. Exploring the issues of how real the science is in sci-fi is a legitimate topic, and an article dedicated to one of the most notable sci-fi series of the lot is not trivia or fancruft. Tarc 13:21, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep No reason given for deletion that doesn't boil down to the nominator not liking the article. It's sourced. If someone wants to use this AFD to argue about the sources, that's fine, but this is pretty pointless so far. (And yes, I wrote most of the prose.)--Chaser - T 13:56, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Subject of at least one documentary on the history channel. FrozenPurpleCube 17:58, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletions. -- the wub "?!" 19:58, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep, only keep votes so far... well sourced, had previous afd's, no good argument for deletion, etc... Mathmo ^Talk 00:59, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.