Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phinditt

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 04:52, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Phinditt

Declined speedy. Website with questionable notability, Alexa ranking of 2,165,583. Only third-party reference is a Facebook user comment. Delete. Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 02:37, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:N and WP:ORG. Edison (talk) 02:55, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - The problem with "Phinditt" is the fact that I can't find any info about it. Maybe if a couple news sites picked up on it than I would change my mind, but right now the closest thing to that is a Facebook page that doesn't meet the cut. -Marcusmax(speak) 03:33, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The website appears to have active content, but I can't escape the feeling that it is mostly or completely manufactured, and does not lead anywhere. Bigboss1789 (talk · contribs) appears to be a WP:SPA. —EncMstr (talk) 06:00, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

you can find many articles in google search for phinditt, it has notable sources —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bigboss1789 (talk • contribs) 07:32, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - A google news search shows zero hits. That the site exists is not in question. That it is not currently notable is also not, in my view, in question, and it's still WP:SPAM regardless. (Disclosure: I speedied this article yesterday as a G11, which it still is; it was also then (and remains) an A7.) Frank | talk 19:29, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: All that I can find is trivial mentions. Fails WP:WEB. Iowateen (talk) 07:24, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 11:59, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.