Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Persistor.NET (2nd nomination)
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 13:38, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
AfDs for this article:
- Persistor.NET (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable, outdated, only 1'000 downloads. D-Woźniak (talk) 16:21, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! Babymissfortune 16:31, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 12:56, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
- Comment: Worth noting that this article and AfD are not about the current persistor.net website (a blog about games) but about a previous .NET software framework of that name. AllyD (talk) 13:04, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
- Delete: While noting the different opinion in the 2006 AfD, I don't see a "Best Visual Studio 2005 PowerToy utilizing SQL Server Express" award as demonstrating inherent notability. Subsequent to that AfD, I can also see mention in a 2007 Salzburg business award (p2) but again that does not seem to carry encyclopaedic notability. These aside, there seem to be only a few sporadic online forum mentions around a decade ago. I don't see the sources required for WP:NSOFT or WP:GNG. AllyD (talk) 13:57, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, !dave 18:44, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, !dave 18:44, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.