Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Per Sempre Amore

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Pick 'n' Mix. J04n(talk page) 11:41, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Per Sempre Amore (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Relies too much on primary sources. Fails WP:NMUSIC due to no claims of notability being established in the article. Kirbanzo (talk) 14:38, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 12:48, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Hung consensus...needs more !votes
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  — FR+ 06:56, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as subject fails WP:NSINGLE. It does not meet any of the listed criteria. Long time since those were listed in an AfD so we might be forgetting them: Songs and singles are probably notable if they have been the subject of multiple, non-trivial published works whose sources are independent of the artist and label. This includes published works in all forms, such as newspaper articles, other books, television documentaries or reviews. This excludes media reprints of press releases, or other publications where the artist, its record label, agent, or other self-interested parties advertise or speak about the work.
If anything, it's too soon. -The Gnome (talk) 10:36, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Not notable. Not influential. Not significant. Not fun to listen to either (just checked it out on YouTube). Chisme (talk) 21:59, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge selectively to the album article Pick 'n' Mix--would just add chart position there. Or at least redirect, given this article is 10 years old. Per WP:NSONGS: Notability aside, a standalone article is appropriate only when there is enough material to warrant a reasonably detailed article; articles unlikely ever to grow beyond stubs should be merged to articles about an artist or album. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 13:53, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.