Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Penguin Vic (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. postdlf (talk) 23:40, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Penguin Vic

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Still a short article with no references establishing WP:Notability 5 years after first AfD Closeapple (talk) 07:01, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. -- Closeapple (talk) 07:13, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —Closeapple (talk) 07:14, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete (per my own nomination): 5 year old abandoned stub with still no claim or citation of notability following inconclusive AfD in 2006. Per essay Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over, if it's article-worthy, it will get re-created. Only bringing this to AfD instead of WP:PROD as a courtesy because there was a previous AfD. --Closeapple (talk) 10:30, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. This article is about a campaign to increase tourism in Victoria, Australia. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 22:44, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:04, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. There's no indication of notability or apparent interest in developing the article in any way. Nick-D (talk) 04:46, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.