Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Penguin Point
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. --MelanieN (talk) 02:28, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
- Penguin Point (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article does not have any independent, reliable, strong sources to be found. Fails WP:ORG and WP:GNG. The only sources I could find were local newspapers featuring a section about local businesses and a passing mention from elkharttruth.com Jcmcc (Talk) 21:42, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 03:07, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Indiana-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 03:07, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
- CommentIt does have 13 locations. As a "regional" chain you'd expect most sources to be local(ish) and a quick Google News search picks up some decent sources.[1] I would lean towards keep, but maybe someone else will be more thorough than me. CorporateM (Talk) 01:49, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:35, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:ORG and WP:GNG only searches are adverts, no independent RSs.Pincrete (talk) 18:42, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
- Delete advert for a local chain, only source in the article is the subject's own website, web searches turn up a little bit of routine local promotional coverage, fails WP:CORPDEPTH Kraxler (talk) 15:42, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.