Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PeerPong

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 17:44, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

PeerPong

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject fails both WP:GNG and WP:WEBCRIT. Moreover the service is inactive, the webpage domain is for sale, some refs are dead. Less Unless (talk) 16:05, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Less Unless (talk) 16:05, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:17, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:17, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

delete Didn't achieve much coverage when it was alive, now it seems to be dead altogether. Andy Dingley (talk) 17:13, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Defunct company and it doesn't seem to have any historical significance to keep. Expertwikiguy (talk) 01:41, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: An article about a defunct company, whose existence appears to have been covered only by initial proposition descriptions and funding announcements. The article mentions staff moving on to work at Formspring but redirect to Spring.me eems too much of a stretch. Fails WP:NCORP. AllyD (talk) 09:38, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I am unable to locate any significant coverage with in-depth information on the company and containing independent content, fails GNG/WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 12:36, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.