Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pedagoogling
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete --JForget 23:32, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Pedagoogling (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Neologism with zero Google hits: references cited do not mention the term either, but just establish use of the terms "pedagogy" or "Googling" respectively. Delete for failing to meet notability/verifiability criteria. The Anome (talk) 12:02, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as unverifiable neologism per nom. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 13:04, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Wikipedia is not for things made up one day. JohnCD (talk) 15:00, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NEO. Shalom (Hello • Peace) 17:46, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NEO. Wikipedia is not a dictionary or for new phrases you came up with. --Pixelface (talk) 17:53, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. —Pixelface (talk) 17:54, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, non-notable neologism. And I first read it as pedogoogling... JIP | Talk 18:08, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete nonsense neologism. JuJube (talk) 21:25, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete On the article's talk page, the author makes a very telling remark that it will become a very common phrase in eductional circles . When it does, it'll be time for an article. Beeblbrox (talk) 06:51, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - as JohnCD said, Wikipeida is not for thinkgs made up one day. U$er (talk) 21:58, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment snowball fight!!! Beeblbrox (talk) 23:16, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.