Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pdf stacks (software)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 15:00, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pdf stacks (software)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This software has no mentions online that I can find, apart from Wikipedia and the official site (although the name of the product is sufficiently ordinary that there are many unrelated hits). Speedy deletion was declined, but I don't see any evidence that this meets the general notability guidelines, nor any reason to believe that it will. Avram (talk) 18:25, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the only mentions of it online are on its official website, the Wikipedia article itself, and, squeezed between about 200 names of other softwares, on four technology websites, with hardly any information about it whatsoever. I believe this article is not notable. 123 Hedgehog 456 18:33, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:15, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unless independent substantial reliable sources can be found which establish notability.4meter4 (talk) 08:27, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, I can't locate any significant third-party coverage, only entries in lists of software and the like. Not notable yet. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 03:54, 27 February 2011 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.