Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Edgecomb
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to The Green Mile (novel). Firsfron of Ronchester 05:56, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Paul Edgecomb (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails to meet notability guidelines, contains original research Fullmetal2887 (discuss me) 09:29, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to The Green Mile. In its current state, this article mostly amounts to a WP:OR-type comparison of how this character is portrayed in the novel and how he is portrayed in the film. This sort of material does not belong on Wikipedia. Any comparisons between the novel and the film which are made in reliable sources should be covered in the main article. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 21:11, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:26, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:27, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:27, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect - as above - the article recapitulates the main storyline from The Green Mile with a couple of notes about the film portrayal. Since the character has not appeared in any other work there is no reason to have a separate entry. SeaphotoTalk 08:01, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Please do not make redirects to disambiguation pages, as this invites disambig linking errors, and will be swiftly reverted. Our current convention is to redirect character names to the earliest work including that character, which in this case would be The Green Mile (novel). I would agree with redirecting there. Cheers! bd2412 T 18:49, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.