Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parsimony (CMS)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 20:35, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Parsimony (CMS)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article fails WP:NOTABILITY. Article was created by an WP:SPA advertising-only account with no other edits other than related to Parsimony. This software is a Beta prototype, released less than a month ago. Clearly this article is an attempt at advertising. Self-promotion and product placement are not the routes to having an encyclopaedia article. Hu12 (talk) 19:00, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 20:05, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The article creator hadn't been notified; I've done that now. AllyD (talk) 08:27, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The single reference offered describes this as a start-up with a product at Beta stage in June 2012. Without finding anything further than that, this is at best WP:TOOSOON to meet the Notability criteria. AllyD (talk) 08:33, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 19:31, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - per AllyD's comment above, TOOSOON, and insufficiently sourced. Dialectric (talk) 05:34, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.