Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parroty Interactive

Parroty Interactive

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Parroty Interactive (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

DePRODed with the rationale that the page "deserves to stay". WP:ILIKEIT is not a valid rationale, and no actual sources were provided by the person. The company appears to fail WP:NCORP/WP:CORPDEPTH with a lack of coverage in reliable sources. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 15:26, 28 July 2025 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games, Companies, and California. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 15:26, 28 July 2025 (UTC)

With all respect to procedure, I think one is allowed to restore a PROD if an anonymous IP interferes with such a message. IgelRM (talk) 18:31, 28 July 2025 (UTC)

IP editors are not considered a "lesser class" as far as Wikipedia is concerned, unless there is obvious evidence that it is vandalism or purposeful disruption. In this case it doesn't seem that way, just someone who thinks it may be notable, making it a valid dePROD. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 21:52, 28 July 2025 (UTC)