Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paritosh Parmar
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:51, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Paritosh Parmar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:GNG Harsh (talk) 11:40, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails WP:ARTIST. FurrySings (talk) 15:13, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 18:00, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 18:00, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 18:00, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 21:55, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete lack of significant coverage for article. SalHamton (talk) 18:16, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as lacking in-depth coverage in multiple independent sources and lacking a native-language wiki article. If in-depth coverage in multiple independent sources is added to the article, feel free to ping my talk page. Stuartyeates (talk) 03:52, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.