Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parallware

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 22:20, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Parallware

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I previously placed a Prod on this article with the rationale "No evidence that this recently-released compiler has attained notability.". The Prod was endorsed by a second editor but was then removed by an IP (at the same site as many of the article's past edits) without comment or improvement. Hence I am now bringing this to AfD on the same rationale as the Prod. AllyD (talk) 19:35, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I don't see any significant coverage in reliable sources. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:16, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:41, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:41, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:41, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no independent sources, let alone with in depth coverage. Stuartyeates (talk) 23:31, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.