Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paradise and Hell

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 20:52, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Paradise and Hell

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The merge discussion at Talk:Paradise and Hell#Merge with The Haywain Triptych came to the conclusion that the page is a misattribution, but not one that is discussed in reliable sources and hence is better deleted rather than being merged or redirected. Klbrain (talk) 20:52, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Klbrain (talk) 20:52, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per the other discussion. Johnbod (talk) 03:35, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I agree that deletion is in order per the merge discussion. This article is based on one questionable source. Netherzone (talk) 01:58, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:SNOW. Bearian (talk) 04:07, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.