Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/POP Telecom

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 14:19, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

POP Telecom

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a company not properly sourced as passing WP:CORP. As always, every company on earth is not automatically entitled to a Wikipedia article just because it exists, and has to earn passage by virtue of having reliable source coverage about it in sources independent of itself. But existence is the only notability claim on offer here, and there are no reliable sources being cited to support it at all -- and while it was recently stubbed down from a longer version, that was semi-advertorialized, still made no stronger claim of notability, and was referenced solely to a routine business directory that isn't a WP:GNG-worthy source.
Nothing here, either in the current version of the article or in any past diff that I've viewed in the edit history, is "inherently" notable enough to exempt it from having to have proper referencing. Bearcat (talk) 14:13, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Internet, and United Kingdom. Bearcat (talk) 14:13, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.