Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PANTHEON.tech

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 12:34, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

PANTHEON.tech

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable software company. Abishe (talk) 01:54, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Abishe (talk) 01:54, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Abishe (talk) 01:54, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Abishe (talk) 01:54, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Abishe, I added some sources I found regarding this company (in case of publications and such). The reason why I wanted to create a page for this company was, that I saw it at a few conferences I attended in 2019 and was intrigued by what they were doing. I don't know if this is the place to discuss their contributions to open-source software and so on, but please let me know what I can do, in order to improve the site and avoid deletion. Thank you! User:Tchdown svk (talk).

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -Nahal^(T) 09:36, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Most references are mentions-in-passing with some churnalism-type profile/interviews. None of the references in the article are of use to establishing notability. After a further search I am unable to locate any significant coverage with in-depth information on the company and containing independent content, fails GNG/WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 20:13, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.