Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Owl (software)
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jenks24 (talk) 17:36, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Owl (software) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Notability of this software is not established. No reliable secondary sources neither in article, nor in the wild. PROD contested. Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 16:55, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 16:59, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 16:59, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Lacks reliable independent secondary sources to establish notability as required by WP:GNG. Googling, the only thing I could find were some mentions of very obviously different Owl Software in the early 80s. I couldn't find anything on this company nor can I see a reason why it even might be notable. Wikipedia is not for WP:PROMOTION. Msnicki (talk) 17:08, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: This is not significant software, so it doesn't meet WP:NSOFT (nor is it going to). -- BenTels (talk) 21:12, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: per above. I'd be interested to see more about how it works/is supposed to work, but that info is apparently unavailable for now. Zujua (talk) 20:24, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No coverage or discussion that I can find by any independent reliable sources, the article does not meet WP:NSOFT --LoudHoward (talk) 13:05, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.