Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Outloud

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JForget 02:55, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Outloud

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete, seems to be a circle jerk over a band with no notability. I see no sources that back up that this band meets inclusion guidelines, Hell In A Bucket (talk) 14:52, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am the person who added the article, first of all outloud is a band who is just starting but already gotten a lot of attention for a band who has just released a debut album, and second i've seen smaller bands that havnt been deleted. How can i back up the article more. --Firewindwik (talk) 15:05, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no notability per WP:BAND. Possible WP:COI. (GregJackP (talk) 15:18, 27 February 2010 (UTC))[reply]

i've looked at WP:BAND and it says "Has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent from the musician or ensemble itself and reliable" and they have been in multiple rock/metal magazines including Rock Hand and Metal Hammer and they are on a major lable. --Firewindwik (talk) 15:33, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails the specific criteria of WP:BAND for having a single album only and being on a non-major label (Frontier does not appear to be major). Fails the general notability guidelines for the absence of coverage presented in the article. —C.Fred (talk) 15:45, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:52, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this band. Joe Chill (talk) 00:23, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.