Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Outerloop Management

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. slakrtalk / 05:07, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Outerloop Management (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Apparently a non-notable management company. All currently cited references are to passing directory-level mentions. On a Google search I found only similar directory mentions, blogs, press releases, and self-published content, and one interview with one of the principals of the company. Not enough to establish notability, in my view. The article is not promotional in tone, but it's mere presence serves to some extent as promotion, if my conclusion that the firm is not notable is correct. DES (talk) 15:55, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Maryland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:33, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:33, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:33, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.