Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Out ta Get Me
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Appetite for Destruction. Stifle (talk) 08:21, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Out ta Get Me (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Short stub on a non-notable song that was not released as a single, and failed to chart. Lack of sources indicates lack of independent third-party coverage. Fails WP:NSONGS. Note that while the article is tagged with a proposal to be merged into the Appetite for Destruction article, the talk page gives no indication of any thread that proposes that this article should be merged. → Dylan620 (Toolbox Alpha, Beta) 21:33, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- As an additional note, Out Ta Get Me (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) redirects to the article, if the closing admin closes this AfD with consensus to delete, then could s/he please delete the redirect as well? → Dylan620 (Toolbox Alpha, Beta) 21:36, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - Why do you want the redirect deleted?FingersOnRoids 20:44, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I only want the redirect deleted if the article is deleted too. That way, we avoid yet another broken redirect. ;P → Dylan620 (Toolbox Alpha, Beta) 20:51, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Ah, I misunderstood. I thought it redirected to the album. Thanks for the explanation.FingersOnRoids 21:39, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I only want the redirect deleted if the article is deleted too. That way, we avoid yet another broken redirect. ;P → Dylan620 (Toolbox Alpha, Beta) 20:51, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as non-notable song, will likely get undone if redirected. Not enough sourcing, no notability asserted beyond being by a notable act. Don't worry about the redirect, it'll get deleted if the article does too. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 21:41, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete A non-notable single that should have been redirected to Appetite for Destruction long ago.
On a side note, User:Crazysuit apparently did leave a mention on Appetite for Destruction's talk page. Sorry, wrong proposal. just a little insignificant 21:42, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply] - Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 18:09, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge with Appetite for Destruction. No reason not to. The stub as it stands has a source (perhaps added after the AfD started) so it is legitimate to add the information to the album article. I should note that allmusic shows a cover version, but the artist does not seem to have a Wikipedia article and so may not be notable.Rlendog (talk) 18:28, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge and Redirect - with Appetite for Destruction, per WP:NSONGS, which suggests redirecting songs that don't meet the criteria to their respective albums. Again, just because song redirects tend to get redirected doesn't mean we shouldn't keep them, we just need to make sure the redirects aren't undone.FingersOnRoids 20:44, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.