Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Organizing (structure)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 15:07, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Organizing (structure)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lacks notability as an individual topic and would be sufficiently covered by adding in the material into the disambig page Organizing. In its current (and former state before I edited it), the article is basically a definition of "Organizing" (WP:NOTDICTIONARY), which can already be found on Wiktionary. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 23:01, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 03:49, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I see from the history that this was a couple of sentences split out from Organizing (management). It seems to be nothing more than a definition of one sense of organize. Given the parenthetical, I don't see any potential for other content. Cnilep (talk) 02:11, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
No Vote an unsourced dictdef, with a bizarre disambiguation. That said, there certainly must be some article on the profession of Marie Kondo. Professional organizing is very promotional (though I've removed the worst of it), and Orderliness is another bad dictdef. power~enwiki (π, ν) 03:50, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

power~enwiki, I would say that Professional organizing could cover Kondo's profession, however, imho KonMari method is the best spot for her philosophy. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 21:41, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jack Frost (talk) 07:13, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Clarityfiend (talk) 19:47, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.