Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Optrint

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:05, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Optrint

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD ineligible because it was PROD'd without rationale and subsequently de-PROD'd, May last year (my bad for missing that).

Appears to be a neologism, based on the scarcity of google hits for both "Optronic Intelligence" and "OPTRINT". Certainly not enough sources to maintain its own article. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 23:51, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 23:51, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. CThomas³ (talk) 06:32, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: A longstanding unreferenced stub page. Searches find a bullet point mention among several surveillance technologies in this web page (in German) but I am not seeing the WP:RS coverage of either the OPTRINT abbreviation or Optronic Intelligence term which would be needed to confirm that there is a WP:GNG topic. Optronics is itself a longstanding redirect so not a suitable redirect target. AllyD (talk) 06:38, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.