Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Optimal Flexible Architecture

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 08:03, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Optimal Flexible Architecture

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't appear to meet WP:NOTABILITY. Boleyn (talk) 16:16, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 16:48, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 16:48, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 16:48, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Can you elaborate on what is not notable about it? Thomas d stewart (talk) 19:03, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas d stewart, there is nothing I can find that shows it meets notability standards. Which part of WP:NOTABILITY do you think it meets? Boleyn (talk) 20:28, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Boleyn, I don't think OFA is notable in general, nor is it notable in the computing field. However in the context of Oracle database products it does have significant coverage. Perhaps it would be better as a section in Oracle Database?

Delete or send to draft until adequately sourced. Fails WP:GNG. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 21:20, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kudpung, why would sourcing effect anything I thought GNG covered subject and not content. Thomas d stewart (talk) 13:46, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, b uidhe 06:01, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Software standard article of unclear notability, lacking independent references. Oracle refs are not independent and do not contribute to establishing notability. A search turned up no significant WP:RS coverage of this standard.Dialectric (talk) 02:01, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.