Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Open-space learning

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Coffee // have a cup // beans // 00:49, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Open-space learning (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This methodology does not demonstrate that it is used outside of the University of Warwick, and thus does not demonstrate how it is notable. Primefac (talk) 10:41, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:40, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA1000 10:28, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Google Books gives me a number of mentions in papers and publications in education, but I am not seeing enough from the excerpts to determine whether it is passing or not. [1] (source #1 in article) remains the most prominent with the name right in the book title. [2] has a section on "Open-space Technology" within its "A to Z of Collective Learning" part. 野狼院ひさし u/t/c 15:23, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: This appears to be the same as the open classroom, a popular pedagogical fad in the 1970s. Perhaps merge? Bearian (talk) 18:07, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 00:48, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.