Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oneworld Accuracy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:58, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oneworld Accuracy

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of any notability. Three of the refs attest to the fact that the company has been used by the Nigerian government. One other is an academic paper, one is a commercial site advertising and one is a mention as a partner firm. None are independent and reliable. An earlier PROD was removed from the article. The creator wrote on the article talk page in a way that suggested COI. Fails WP:GNG Velella ^{Velella Talk} 22:54, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Hhkohh (talk) 02:36, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Hhkohh (talk) 02:38, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for lack of WP:CORPDEPTH. To make matters worse, there are no inline citations and so much of the content appears to be original research / advertising. Jmertel23 (talk) 14:09, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and Jmertel23 fails WP:NCORP.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 21:04, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails as per improved NCORP. Dial911 (talk) 15:18, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.