Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Objects from The Lost Room (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Opabinia regalis (talk) 05:21, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Objects from The Lost Room

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

unsourced OR fancruft of a 3 minor mini-series that has gained no long term traction or following Gaijin42 (talk) 20:18, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as obsessive, under-sourced fancruft. Wikipedia's notability criteria and tolerence of flaky articles as moved on since the last AfD in 2007. Sionk (talk) 21:44, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. If there is a fan wiki somewhere I'd recommend adding this there, but this is a bit too fancruft for Wikipedia. This was a three episode miniseries that got some coverage but not an overwhelmingly large amount to where we'd be able to rationalize an article for something like the One Ring or even a page like List of Middle-earth characters. The coverage of these artifacts just aren't there and this is already adequately covered in the main article. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 03:47, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no reliable sources to establish article context. CookieMonster755 (talk) 04:45, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Dai Pritchard (talk) 08:12, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:44, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:44, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:44, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. WP:OR: relies entirely on primary sources. Pburka (talk) 22:19, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.