Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OKR FM
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:07, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- OKR FM (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Nominated for speedy. I'm unaware of any precedent consensus on the notability of radio stations. No vote. Ryan Delaney talk 13:58, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep. According to the common outcomes and Wikipedia:Notability (media), radio stations are generally considered notable "if they broadcast over the air and originate at least a portion of their programming schedule in their own studios. According to this, some of the station's programming is original, and it clearly broadcasts over the air. On the other hand, I am unable to find reliable sources demonstrating much more than the existence of the station and the frequency on which it broadcasts.
- Keep. Deleting radio station stubs would start an unprecedented avalanche. The proposal at Wikipedia:Notability (media) has not been accepted yet. There is talk going on about it, so this article should be kept pending a consensus there first. ZabMilenko 12:22, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep If it's actually existent and non-Ham, I see no reason to delete. --Cybercobra (talk) 03:23, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 03:34, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Per standard notablity. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 03:41, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.