Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/O3plus

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 08:14, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

O3plus

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

~~I am also nominating the following related pages for the same reason and because they seem to be duplicate articles:~~

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWLAs per the comment by User:Bkonrad thanks, I should have checked out the history. --Dom from Paris (talk) 09:52, 27 September 2018 (UTC) [reply]

fails WP:NORG. The sources are product placement stuff in lists. Nothing found in a WP:BEFORE search. Looks like a WP:UPE Dom from Paris (talk) 10:27, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Dom from Paris (talk) 10:30, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Dom from Paris (talk) 10:30, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. promotional , and borderline notable at best. DGG ( talk ) 20:42, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The recently created O3 page overwrote a valid disambiguation page. I have restored the disambiguation page. older ≠ wiser 09:47, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.