Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nxt

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 18:57, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nxt

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Stub, does not appear to meet GNG. Sources are a generic datasheet from a database of different cryptocoins, the official website of this coin, and an official press release brought to Yahoo via Accesswire. In other words, I'm not seeing a lot of coverage of this topic by sources independent of the subject. I am suggesting that it be deleted, with no prejudice toward redoing the page if it starts getting coverage from reliable, independent sources in the future. Breadblade (talk) 08:27, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:55, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:55, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:55, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment at the moment my vote is delete, however I would like to see better references for this cryptocurrency because it does have novel developments, and eventually there will be a valid/valuable article on it. VinceSamios (talk) 20:02, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No significant coverage to indicate notability. Once more sources are added then it might be kept. ///EuroCarGT 21:30, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - has good sources. Depreciated (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 21:59, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 11:22, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, not enough independent sources to indicate notability, sources in the article are either not independent or substantial. Note that the "Yahoo Finance" ref is just a republished press release. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 11:24, 18 January 2014 (UTC).[reply]
Delete - Fails WP:GNG, sources clearly insufficient (blogs, adverts etc.). Google search did not yield any reliable sources either. Smite-Meister (talk) 14:22, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - electronic currency article of unclear notability, lacking significant RS coverage to establish notability. The yahoo finance ref is just an accesswire press release, and the other sources are blogs and developers' sites. A search revealed incidental mentions, but no significant RS coverage.Dialectric (talk) 17:16, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.