Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Numotion
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. JForget 02:35, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Numotion (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No notablility has been established for this software developer, Google turns up nothing in particular. The redirect from Nucontroller CMS to this page should also be deleted. Artw (talk) 00:09, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this company. Joe Chill (talk) 00:16, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete – I can't find any reliable third-party sources backing up the notability of this CMS (content management system). For one, I have never heard of it while programming with PHP/MySQL (but I have heard of CMS Made Simple and Drupal). —MC10 (T•C•GB•L) 05:22, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I can't find coverage in reliable sources to establish notability. Jujutacular T · C 06:40, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:07, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:07, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. This is unambiguous advertising: an international provider of content management systems... well-known product... belongs to the most innovative ICT companies. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:43, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Dutch company, therefore please search for non-English (esp Dutch) sources to keep an open mind about notability/non-notability. Article language definitely needs cleanup as Smerdis says. Jodi.a.schneider (talk) 04:02, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.