Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nspluginwrapper
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Closed with no prejudice against speedy renomination. (non-admin closure) Michaelzeng7 (talk) 20:01, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Nspluginwrapper (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No indication or claim of notability. I couldn't find any third-party sources discussing this software in detail. Psychonaut (talk) 08:47, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Gong show 15:33, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep: Nspluginwrapper is found in multiple Linux distributions. I personally have used it to wrap x86 plugins for x64 usage and GTK2 plugins so they work in GTK3 web browsers. But as a glue library most users do not know about it unless they absolutely have to use it.
There are a few older external articles on it that could be referenced, such as [1] and [2]. But since it is a program which only needs to be started once to solve a user's problem and may never be seen again as it works in the background, I think it may be hard to make this article more than a stub. Cerlyn (talk) 19:02, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Michaelzeng7 (talk) 19:06, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 19:24, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.