Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NonStopTech

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. joe decker ^talk 21:56, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

NonStopTech

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable and fails WP:GNG AdrianGamer (talk) 15:00, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no indication of notability per WP:CORP, and no significant coverage online from WP:RS. Speedied twice today already on grounds of notability. NeemNarduni2 (talk) 15:03, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. My searches turned up no reliable sources to create an article with. FuriouslySerene (talk) 15:26, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete "internationally based" is code for this is self-promotion. Curro2 (talk) 15:27, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Article states they are a multinational media company but right now NonStopTech is a tech review website run by a collaboration of tech YouTubers. I find no independent coverage of the website. The creation of the Wikipedia article happened the day after they launched their new version of their website. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:30, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, no indication of notability.-KH-1 (talk) 01:45, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per others, small non-notable company, article creator is SPA with apparent COI. Citobun (talk) 05:33, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No indication of notability. → Call me Razr Nation 05:59, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.