Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nogrid points

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. So Why 11:09, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nogrid points

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I fail to see any non-promotional covg. in reliable secondary sources about the software. Winged Blades^Godric 12:44, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:16, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:16, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment -- Nogrid pointsblow seems closely tied to this. --Deacon Vorbis (talk) 18:13, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. All I can find in Google scholar are false positives and a handful of almost-uncited papers by the same people. I don't think it passes the standard of WP:GNG that people independent of its developers have written and reliably published nontrivial material about it. —David Eppstein (talk) 07:11, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} 23:48, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - news and book searches drew a blank. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 11:02, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.