Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nikolay Zak

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 11:21, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nikolay Zak

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Page does not appear to meet WP:NACADEMIC, all of the information outside Schooling and Career is featured in Jeanne_Calment#Skepticism_regarding_age and page views in the past 30 days were just 350. All of the sources are related to the Jeanne Calment hypothesis and all but one are focused on the study. The only criteria which appears to apply to Zak in WP:NACADEMIC is 7. But although, he has had media attention outside of his field, it is not covered under WP:NACADEMIC, A; he is not cited as an expert, B; Fringe-Theroes are not included and C; is not relevant.

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. ☢️ Radioactive 🎃 (talk) 08:39, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. ☢️ Radioactive 🎃 (talk) 08:39, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. This guy is not very notable. He does not meet the criteria for inclusion in Wikipedia. Fish567 (talk) 13:37, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Citations not there. Xxanthippe (talk) 02:27, 30 August 2021 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.