Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nigel C. Dawes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jayjg ^(talk) 21:55, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nigel C. Dawes

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BIO. Was deprodded because "sources are present", however the external links do not demonstrate notability, nor do any of the google hits if you analyse them. ukexpat (talk) 21:40, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- ukexpat (talk) 21:41, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. -- ukexpat (talk) 21:41, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I was the editor who deprodded the article. Article was tagged with prod-blp, which is only concerned with the absence of sources, (which is a lower standard than that of notability.) I believe that the sources listed satisfied the requirements of prod-blp, which is why I deprodded. As to the larger question of notability, I have no opinion. -- RoninBK _{T C} 22:34, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:PROF. Springnuts (talk) 23:21, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:PROF and WP:AUTHOR. Nothing much found at Google, and Google News finds only a similarly named hockey player. --MelanieN (talk) 00:22, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.