Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nick Extra

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 04:22, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nick Extra

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unnotable time-filling continuity for Nickelodeon's British network which solely exists as WP:ADVERT content with no links out or in to speak of, and seems to have nothing written about it. Article editor DylansTVChannel (talk · contribs) abandoned their account after most of their articles were taken to deletion and now edits under DylanGLC2011 (talk · contribs), so that account will be warned. Nate • (chatter) 03:35, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:01, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as completely unsoruced. Stuartyeates (talk) 10:06, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 00:08, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Nickelodeon (UK & Ireland); it would deserve a mention there if any reliable source can be found. --Colapeninsula (talk) 14:46, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment There's nothing linking to it though. Who would search for something that has no connections to any article? Nate • (chatter) 13:48, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

People do search for things using search engines or the Wikipedia search function (and its auto-suggest feature), not just by following blue links in Wikipedia. It is something that people may search for, e.g. if they want to know who presented it. --Colapeninsula (talk) 10:03, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dori ☾Talk ☯ Contribs☽ 21:14, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Nickelodeon (UK and Ireland) in "Current spin-off channels" section. The channel does seem to exist (link) although there is very little information about it anywhere, certainly not enough to make it notable. CodeTheorist (talk) 21:51, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment This is not a channel, but promotional spots airing on on the main Nickelodeon service to fill time and promote shows. The concept you mention is just a video on demand service that solely exists as a barker channel to promote services in an automated form. Nate • (chatter) 00:25, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. It's worth a very brief mention on Nickelodeon (UK and Ireland) somewhere, but certainly isn't notable enough for its own article. Nor do I see any need for a redirect. CodeTheorist (talk) 07:53, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:GNG. No sourced content or incoming articles warranting a merge/redirect. -- Trevj (talk) 17:24, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.