Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nexus (Charmed)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to List of locations in Charmed. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 01:25, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nexus (Charmed)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article fails WP:FICT, WP:NOTE and WP:RS. Limited evidence of independent notability. Aoba47 (talk) 17:36, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Aoba47 (talk) 17:36, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Aoba47 (talk) 17:36, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Fictional concept with no independent notability. The only sources being used in the article are the episodes of the series itself, which do not establish notability, and I can find no reliable sources at all talking about the concept. As there is no information here aside from some crufty plot summaries, and there is nothing here that is being supported with reliable sources, there's nothing here worth merging to any of the other pages about Charmed. 64.183.45.226 (talk) 18:27, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Aoba47 (talk) 20:44, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to List of locations in Charmed. I loved this show back in the day but yea, this is only a thing within the fictional 'verse. ValarianB (talk) 20:36, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I was a fan of this show too, but I completely agree it is only notable within the fictional universe. Aoba47 (talk) 20:44, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merge per ValarianB. Jclemens (talk) 01:32, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your comment and that makes sense to me. Aoba47 (talk) 02:03, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.