Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nexstgo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:58, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nexstgo

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I do not believe this company meets WP:CORPDEPTH as I can find no substantial coverage in reliable independent sources, although admittedly there may be some in Chinese. The article has been created by a single-purpose account with a likely conflict of interest and is just a free advertisement for this recently started company. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:32, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 14:58, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 14:59, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete start-up and no in-depth coverage. Here is the interview (seem the brand is owned by a HK listed company Alco Holdings) and here is one short article about the product [1] Matthew hk (talk) 15:05, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I am writting this in response to "Articles for deletion/Nexstgo", this article should be kept to vast the content of Wikipedia. To further support the content of article, more coverage from independent sources are added. In fact, many of the coverage are written in Traditional Chinese since this is a Hong Kong based company, some coverage are some written in English or other languages by various platform among different countries. I am interested in tech and laptop, also a newbie to Wikipedia! There are various laptop brands in Wikipedia, and this is not a brand new brand in 2019! I tried adding this to make it more comprehensive, this is the reason of creation of this article. Content in this article are based on fact, I tried hard to make it neutral as others in Wikipedia. Feel free to edit this article if you disagree with it, but I am 100% disagree that there is conflict of interest and free advertisement.SavvyNotebook (talk) 09:55, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not a place of paid editing, which i don't understand the motive of flooding wikipedia with non-notable (by WP:GNG and WP:CORPDEPTH standard, fails to have external source as citation, to write an in-depth article). The parent company may be notable, but not the newly created division/brand. Matthew hk (talk) 13:36, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may refer to "References" in it, see its articles or news from various platform from different media among hong kong, taiwan, singapore, malaysia, japan, india, china... even you may google to find out the coverage related to product, company and its exposure in CES101.78.221.226 (talk) 08:48, 25 January 2019 (UTC) — 101.78.221.226 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. Matthew hk (talk) 13:08, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@101.78.221.226: product test report can prove the existence of the product, but nothing to do on writing an in-depth article about the brand or the company. A notebook with X dimension , Y design on air flow , use Z CPU, have no information to improve the detail of the producer. Matthew hk (talk) 01:35, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment User SavvyNotebook has not responded to the message on his talkpage asking him to disclose any conflict of interest, and has continued to edit despite the instruction "do not edit further until you answer this message." Additionally, IP 101.78.221.226 has commented at this AfD but has made no other contributions to Wikipedia. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:34, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:33, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 09:56, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: does not meet WP:NCORP; significant RS coverage not found. K.e.coffman (talk) 17:39, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.