Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Newt Syrup

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 10:10, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Newt Syrup

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NOTDIR, WP:ENN. NN open-source program, no RS to assert notability. SPA creation by the developer, who tried to also create an article on himself, which was speedied. MSJapan (talk) 17:07, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Dialectric (talk) 13:41, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Newt (programming library) as a preferred WP:ATD. ~Kvng (talk) 16:42, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:24, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Nothing source to merge, no previous mention of Syrup in the parent article. czar 21:50, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Material doesn't have to be referenced to be eligible for merge. Some editors prefer merge material to be verifyable. Do you think this is contentious material or that there could be a problem verifying this content? ~Kvng (talk) 14:06, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 01:28, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Literally, no independent sources available. I'm also opposed to a merge here, firstly, because the content is unsourced. But even if the content was sourced, I don't see a point of adding this to Newt (programming library). This application framework simply uses Newt for its user interface - it is not in any way "related" to newt. As an analogy, this framework uses Python and if we don't consider a merge to Python, we shouldn't consider a merge to Newt as well. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 15:20, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Software article of unclear notability, lacking independent references. A search turned up no significant WP:RS coverage. Oppose Merge per Lemongirl942 - there is little connection to Newt as these are separate pieces of software with different developers.Dialectric (talk) 15:26, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as this was ridiculously removed despite its clear non-notability and unsourced state with no actual attempts of improving it; my analysis has also confirmed no apparent signs of better. SwisterTwister talk 23:00, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.