Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Network and Management Laboratory
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:45, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
- Network and Management Laboratory (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This is pure advertisement. There are no RS telling the lab is notable. There are other labs with the same name. My very best wishes (talk) 03:54, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
- Note this edit. The page was a subject of proposed deletion, but someone apparently from the lab reverted the Prod. My very best wishes (talk) 04:11, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. This one seems more clear-cut than the related Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carlos Becker Westphall (2nd nomination). Per WP:ORGCRIT, we need published sources, by people independent of this lab, that provide significant depth of coverage of the lab. If such sources exist, they certainly haven't been included in our article. —David Eppstein (talk) 07:42, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. Bilhauano (talk) 15:30, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Onel5969 TT me 20:51, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Onel5969 TT me 20:51, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. As statet by others. -Snorre/Antwelm (talk) 21:52, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - Article is unsourced, but even with sources, article content as written doesn't suggest encyclopedic notability. Shelbystripes (talk) 16:35, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.