Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nested Context Language

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. postdlf (talk) 19:03, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nested Context Language

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced; fails to meet notability as well as WP:V _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 17:12, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep It is (and is already referenced as) an ITU standard. Is the nominator planning on taking every telecoms-related XML standard to AfD? Have they read the comments against such behaviour elsewhere, at recent AfDs and at the RFC/U about them? Andy Dingley (talk) 00:14, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:23, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:24, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:24, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 03:55, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Not only is it referenced in the article as an ITU standard as Andy Dingley states, but there are many papers about it in the scholarly literature. I've added four good sources to a new further reading section in the article. It took me all of 2 minutes to find them. It obviously meets the GNG, folks.— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 23:54, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, nice amount of source coverage, — Cirt (talk) 17:27, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.